澳彩开奖

PORTLAND, OR 鈥� Immigrant rights advocates challenging the weaponization of the U.S. immigration courts applaud Friday鈥檚 late-afternoon ruling by the U.S. District Court of Oregon that their lawsuit, Las Americas v Trump, will move forward. The legal services providers, Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP), Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. (CLINIC), the 澳彩开奖 (澳彩开奖), Innovation Law Lab, and Santa Fe Dreamers Project (SFDP), working with Perkins Coie LLP for pro bono support, allege that the Administration has failed to establish an impartial immigration court as required under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Take Care Clause of the U.S. Constitution - weaponizing them into deportation machines against asylum seekers and other noncitizens - and asks the court to end the unlawful use of the courts to effectuate mass deportations instead of fair decisions.听
听
In Friday鈥檚 order, the Honorable Karin Immergut denied the government鈥檚 motion to dismiss the case. 听 The district court rejected the government鈥檚 arguments, holding that all of the organizations鈥� claims could proceed, including their claim that the Attorney General has grossly mismanaged the immigration court system and weaponized the system against asylum seekers.

鈥淭his is a clear victory for everyone who has sought a fair hearing in immigration court, only to face a system plagued by rampant dysfunction and policies designed to subvert justice,鈥� said Melissa Crow, senior supervising attorney with the 澳彩开奖鈥檚 Immigrant Justice Project. 鈥淔or asylum seekers and those who represent them, the current process is like playing Russian roulette. Despite the life-or-death stakes in these cases, there is little rhyme or reason to the court鈥檚 workings apart from prioritizing deportation at all costs.鈥�
听
鈥淔riday鈥檚 decision is an important milestone in our fight for a truly fair, transparent, and independent immigration court,鈥� said Tess Hellgren, staff attorney with Innovation Law Lab. 鈥淲hether an asylum seeker wins or loses should not depend on the political whims of the President or Attorney General. 鈥澨�
听
Not only does the Court鈥檚 decision confirm that the gross mismanagement of the immigration court system is subject to judicial review, it also recognizes that there may be important constitutional checks and balances on the power of presidential administrations to manipulate the immigration courts to achieve mass deportation.听

鈥淭his win is incredibly validating. We often operate under the guise that the work we are doing is impossible,鈥� said Linda Corchado, Managing Attorney of the Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center. 鈥淲e feel uplifted as we can take the giant step forward to tackle the system now, with everything we鈥檝e got.鈥�
听
鈥淎SAP works with families across the United States and at the border who fled persecution and now face countless obstacles to seeking asylum in the U.S. immigration court system,鈥� said Conchita Cruz, Co-Executive Director of ASAP. 鈥淭his decision gets us one step closer to showing that the injustices of the U.S. immigration court system are not only wrong, but illegal. We stand with asylum seekers and immigrants鈥� rights advocates in bringing these abuses to light and demanding better from our government.鈥�
听
The lawsuit, which was filed in December 2019, alleges President Trump, Attorney General Barr, and other members of the executive branch have failed to establish a fair immigration court system in which the plaintiff organizations can provide meaningful legal assistance to their asylum-seeking clients. The complaint outlines pervasive dysfunction and bias within the immigration court system, including:听
鈥⑻�听 听The Enforcement Metrics Policy, , which requires immigration judges to decide cases quickly, at the expense of a fair process, in exchange for favorable performance reviews.听
鈥⑻�听 听The 鈥渇amily unit鈥� court docket, which stigmatizes the cases of recently arrived families and rushes their court dates, often giving families inadequate time to find an attorney and prepare for their hearings.
鈥⑻�听 听Areas that have become known as 鈥渁sylum-free zones,鈥� where virtually no asylum claims have been granted for the past several years.
鈥⑻�听 听The nationwide backlog of pending immigration cases, which has now surpassed 1 million 鈥� meaning that thousands of asylum seekers must wait three or four years for a court date.

In June 2019, Innovation Law Lab and 澳彩开奖 also released a report, based on over two years of research and focus group interviews with attorneys and former immigration judges from around the country, documenting the failure of the immigration court system to fulfill the constitutional and statutory promise of fair and impartial case-by-case adjudication. The report can be accessed here: The Attorney General鈥檚 Judges: How the U.S. Immigration Courts Became a Deportation Tool.
听
The court鈥檚 opinion is HERE.