澳彩开奖

BATON ROUGE, La. 鈥� Two Baton Rouge residents have reached a settlement of their federal and state claims against Rehabilitation Home Incarceration (RHI), a private company, and its owner Cleve Dunn,Sr.听 RHI charged Baton Rouge residents fees after they were released from the local parish prison and put on pre-trial supervision. These fees were not bail or fines, but RHI said they were required for the company to monitor people out on pre-trial release. The company threatened to send .people back to jail if the fees were not paid.

听The settlement stems from a complaint filed by Tayari Ross and Kaiasha White against RHI and Dunn for incarcerating them until they paid RHI鈥檚 fees.听 With the assistance of attorneys with the 澳彩开奖, ACLU Foundation of Louisiana, and the ACLU Foundation, they sued Dunn听for violating the Louisiana and the federal Racketeer听Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Acts by illegally extorting money.听 听White 听also sued RHI for violating her Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process and equal protection under the law, among other state law violations. After the lawsuit was filed, RHI stopped operating in the courts.

听

鈥淩HI used our justice system to make money off of the most vulnerable,鈥� said Emily Early, senior staff attorney with the 澳彩开奖. 鈥淐ourts must stop relying on private companies like RHI that impose onerous fees and conditions as a form of pretrial release.听 These arrangements fly in the face of the Constitution鈥檚 14th Amendment鈥檚 guarantee of equal protection and due process under the law because the practice unfairly uses a person鈥檚 economic situation as a basis for freedom without any consideration of ability to pay.听 Freedom should never be decided based on the size of one鈥檚 wallet.鈥�

听

"RHI used our courts to run an illegal shakedown scheme that preyed on our most vulnerable communities," said Bruce Hamilton, staff attorney at the ACLU of Louisiana."We're glad RHI is no longer operating in courts, but the fight against wealth-based incarceration and predatory supervision schemes must continue. Each day, thousands of people languish in jail -- not based on their guilt or innocence -- but because they cannot afford to buy their freedom. We won't rest until justice is restored and no Louisianans is punished for being poor."

听

The company charged an initial $525 鈥渟tart-up鈥� fee before individuals could be released from jail.听 This fee was charged prior to any court deciding a person鈥檚 guilt or innocence, and with no determination of ability to pay or alternatives for payment.听 Once individuals were released from jail after paying the initial fee, RHI charged additional fees, including a $225 monthly supervision fee, a fee for ankle monitoring, and fees to attend required classes.听

听Unfortunately, this practice and similar practices听 in cash-strapped cities with large populations awaiting trial.

听