League of the South Chieftain Talks 鈥楻ace War鈥�
The (LOS) appears to be having an identity crisis. As the two-year anniversary of the hate group鈥檚 abrupt towards well-dressed and well-mannered street demonstrations approaches, LOS President latest column marks one more chapter in the collapse of what quickly revealed itself to be a laughably transparent fa莽ade of respectability.
The time has come, at least in Hill鈥檚 mind, to ponder what he believes is the real possibility of a race war. Apparently, he likes his odds.
LOS President Michael Hill
鈥淲e Southern nationalists do not want a race war (or any sort of war). But if one is forced on us, we鈥檒l participate,鈥� wrote Hill on the LOS website. 鈥淪outhern whites are geared up and armed to the teeth.鈥�
Such statements may come as a shock, given the fact that the LOS has spent much of the last two years attempting to promote its message to 鈥渞egular鈥� southerners through the use of mainstream, conservative messaging on issues such as 鈥渢raditional marriage鈥� and the 鈥渄emographic displacement of southerners.鈥� Of course, that was never a very honest presentation. After all, Hill is the same man who at a Georgia LOS meeting in 2011 urged his constituents to begin stocking up on AK-47s, hollow-point bullets, and, most remarkably, tools to derail trains.
Then, last year, Hatewatch revealed that the LOS was actively 鈥� and secretly 鈥� training a uniformed, paramilitary unit to be called the that was tasked with advancing a second southern secession.
Hill鈥檚 latest piece, which appeared in the wake of nearly a week of demonstrations and rioting in the Baltimore area following the death of Freddie Gray in police custody, focuses on the myriad advantages of the angry white man in a potential race war. The reason, asserts Hill, is the white man鈥檚 innate superiority.
鈥淣egroes are more impulsive than whites,鈥� says Hill, who once taught at a historically black university in Alabama. 鈥淭enacity and organization are not the negroes [sic] strong suits. If the war could be won by ferocity alone, he might have a chance. But like the adrenaline rush that sparks it, ferocity is short lived. And it can be countered by cool discipline, an historic white trait, and all that stems from it.鈥�
The race war Hill imagines is nothing more than fear-mongering in the style of the late neo-Nazi novel The Turner Diaries. That book depicted a race war in which whites murder Jews, black people, 鈥渞ace-mixers鈥� and a host of others in order to build an 鈥淎ryan鈥� state. Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh was carrying photocopied pages from the dystopian novel when he was arrested, apparently to explain his motives in case he were to be killed by police.
Hill seems to revel in the details of the bloodshed he thinks may be imminent.
鈥淭hings would begin to get interesting once the widespread terror spread out to the suburbs,鈥� he writes in his new essay. 鈥淭he most likely flashpoints would be white owned suburban businesses or neighborhoods where armed men and women stood ready to defend themselves. At this point white discipline, resources, and firepower would start to become a factor; however, would American suburbanites, after decades of PC brainwashing, have the will to fight back in sufficient number to quell the black tide?鈥�
Hill also throws in a little of his increasingly apparent anti-Semitism. Following his recent posting of an essay by the disgraced former professor and anti-Semitic ideologue in a LOS Facebook group, Hill now suggests that one of the South鈥檚 main problems is 鈥淛ewry鈥� and what he depicts as the Jewish-controlled media. 鈥淎BC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, and other largely Jewish-Progressive owned media would doubtless fan the flames, justifying black behavior while conversely condemning white reaction,鈥� Hill writes as he contemplates the difficulties that will face the white man.
Hill goes on to fantasize about the end of 鈥渨hite guilt,鈥� a common theme among neo-Nazis and others on the radical right. 鈥淎merican negroes, and those Jew/Gentile Progressives who supported their lawless behavior for decades, would have used up whatever 鈥榗ivil rights鈥� capital they may have accumulated with average white Americans (and perhaps many Asians and Hispanics),鈥� he writes as he describes what is pictured as the ultimate victory of whites in the South.
When reached by telephone, Hill declined to comment.
Hill ends his essay with a warning that sounds very much like a threat: 鈥淪o if negroes think a 鈥榬ace war鈥� in modern America would be to their advantage, they had better prepare themselves for a very rude awakening. White people may be patient, but our patience does have a limit. You do not want to test that limit.鈥�
听
