New York Times Feature on Sale Left Out a Fact or Two
Peter Applebome of The New York Times wrote a the other day on an interesting topic 鈥� the Second North American Secessionist Convention, held early this month in Chattanooga, Tenn., and attended by members of local secessionist movements from Hawaii to Vermont to Alabama. The piece centered on Kirkpatrick Sale, a well-known leftist intellectual who is the director of something called the , a New York-based group dedicated to secessionism.
Trouble is, Applebome missed a few key facts.
The Oct. 18 Times article is essentially a pillow-soft feature that paints a picture of Sale as a father figure to the somewhat goofy but nevertheless endearing secessionists. It quotes Sale saying that the movement has 鈥渂rought right and left together鈥� and mentions the participation of the League of the South (LOS), a neo-Confederate group in favor of Southern secession. But that鈥檚 where the enlightenment stops.
What Applebome never says is that Sale arranged a co-sponsoring agreement for the Oct. 3-4 convention with the League of the South. He doesn鈥檛 note that most people familiar with consider Sale鈥檚 new partner a white supremacist hate group 鈥� its leader, who calls for a return to 鈥淓uropean cultural hegemony鈥� in the South, has described slavery as 鈥淕od-ordained鈥� and vigorously opposes interracial marriage, and other LOS intellectuals have defended segregation as protecting the 鈥渋ntegrity鈥� of both blacks and whites. And Applebome doesn鈥檛 note that Sale, in a national Associated Press article just two weeks earlier, argued against all the evidence that LOS has been 鈥渨rongly declared鈥� (by the 澳彩开奖) to be racist.
Applebome may have a soft spot for Southern secessionists. Author of the 1997 book Dixie Rising: How the South is Shaping American Values, Politics and Culture, Applebome in the Times article describes the secession movement that led to the Civil War as 鈥渁 movement now seen as racist, violent and a loser.鈥� Now seen? As every serious scholar of the Civil War knows, there is no question that the war was fought to defend slavery and the system of white supremacy.
